When you look at characters like WoW (world of warcraft), it is easy to see that the ideal seems to be the greatest sexual dymorphism. Now whatever it might mean, sexual dymorphism in primates is related to non-monogamy. Today we have two seemingly different body disorders for men and women. Women having annorexia, and men “bigorexia” or muscle dysmorphia. Could this be our subliminal ideal of sexual dymorphism coming out. Do we inherently want to be different, to have our females smaller and our males bigger? Just a thought.
So, as a Sociology major I have (perhaps inevitably) come across people who have voiced their opinions on why sociology is a crock, convoluted, an unacceptable method for conducting science, and not a valid (impractical) study. I hope to address these issues and give a thorough defense of my field, for (obviously) if I had no defense, I should not be a sociology major. I do completely welcome criticism and comments to what I write, and in fact I would love some. I thoroughly believe that the best analysis is derived from discussion and (logical) argumentation. I have put in bold the main points since I realize many of you probably do not want to read my god-knows-how-long argument. SO on with it. I guess I will address the different arguments I have come across one by one Sociology is not credible because it borrows from so many other fields . Indeed, Sociology is extremely interdisciplinary, but I think the complexity is what makes it so grand. We coul...
Comments
Post a Comment