Skip to main content

Free but Structured Long Term Debate in Classrooms?


Obviously this has several current complications given the current school systems, but just bare with me and entertain this idea. 
One of the biggest problems we have with education in America is the inability for students to think scientifically (Steinkuehler 2008). That is to think of knowledge as “an open-ended process of evaluation and argument of hypotheses about whether and how how “algorithms” govern natural phenomena”
So just a brainstorming idea think about this. Kids can pick whatever topic they wan’t, that’s right, it can be what WOW character is the best and why, why we should or should not say the national anthem everday, or why a certain type of pot lamp is inferior to another. I think it is really important here to leave it open ended (which obviously conflicts with the current censoring of school topics) If you leave it open ended you allow students to develop actual interests (not just whether or not schools should have uniforms, we all know that fucking sucks to write about, nobody really gives a crap, its a hypothetical situation that will probably never affect their lives) Again it is extremely important to allow kids to first pick a topic that is inherently interesting to them. This is a concept known as “interest driven learning” (Squire 2011).
Second, develop structured forms of debate between students that lasts for weeks. I think there should be relatively little interference about the modes of resources but rather what they talk about. That is make sure the students keep debating, but don’t monitor how they do it. 
I would be extremely interested to see in this context if the students would start debating fiercely, and by means of trying to prove their point if they would naturally start to delve into scientific methods of evidence and reasoning. In Steinkuehlers article “scientific habits of minds in virtual worlds” she finds that these scientific habits of mind occur in WOW forums about 87% of the time (2008). If an open ended forum in WOW can develop scientific habits perhaps classroom debate can too. 
I don’t feel like making a formal biblography, but for the legitimacy of what I said here these are the references I documented. 
KURT SQUIRE “Videogames and Learning: teaching and participatory culture in the digital age” it is a book. copyright 2011. 
CONSTANCE STEINKUEHLER/SEAN DUNCAN (perhaps  the person I will soon research under that is stienkuehler) article “Scientific Habits of Mind in Virtual Worlds” in the journal sci educ technol. 2008

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Argument Against Sociology Being a Bullshit Study

So, as a Sociology major I have (perhaps inevitably) come across people who have voiced their opinions on why sociology is a crock, convoluted, an unacceptable method for conducting science, and not a valid (impractical) study. I hope to address these issues and give a thorough defense of my field, for (obviously) if I had no defense, I should not be a sociology major. I do completely welcome criticism and comments to what I write, and in fact I would love some. I thoroughly believe that the best analysis is derived from discussion and (logical) argumentation. I have put in  bold  the main points since I realize many of you probably do not want to read my god-knows-how-long argument.  SO on with it. I guess I will address the different arguments I have come across one by one Sociology is not credible because it borrows from so many other fields .  Indeed, Sociology is extremely interdisciplinary, but I think the complexity is what makes it so grand. We coul...
12 comments
Read more

My problems with the strong is the new skinny campaign

When the 'strong is the new skinny' campaign first started, I was pretty excited about it. The first article I saw was a woman who used to be what she considered anorexic. She said she was weak, and barely ate. She fell in love with weight lifting, and said it gave her confidence, strength and courage. She explained how before lifting she was taught to deprive herself, to lack confidence in her body, and be weak. After lifting she felt proud of her new strength, could eat (and was supposed to eat) more, and felt a sense of progress towards muscle, versus progress towards being smaller. She posted new photos of herself showing she didn't look much different (she didn't 'get huge'). Her photos though were fairly normal looking. She probably had a healthy 10-20% body fat, and you could tell she had some solid muscle. Her muscle, however, wasn't rippling out of her skin, and it isn't supposed to be. There are two main types of weight training I want to tal...
4 comments
Read more

Social Motivation and Learning

Hey you guys, I know you guys are busy and hectic with all the midterm grading, but I just wanted to present an original hypothesis/theoretical framework of mine regarding affinity spaces and participatory culture. I’ll give you the long and the short of it so that you can read as little or much as you choose. I definitely value your feedback and am just curious what you think of this. If you think it is valid, it may very well change the way we understand affinity spaces, participatory culture and education. So  the short of   it is this. My theory/hypothesis is that our short term and long term learning interests/motivations/passions are usually linked to using learning as a tool to gain social status in a group. In this context we can understand affinity spaces and participatory culture in a new way. The reason these spaces might be better learning environments is because learning in these environment directly relates to social status in the group. This can be easily ex...
Post a Comment
Read more