Skip to main content

Powerful article talking about discrimination in welfare reform debates


Article talking about discrimination in welfare reform debates
“As the majority of the 104th congress insisted upon circulating misrepresentations of the poor in the context of welfare reform, Congresswomen of color felt themselves increasingly marginalized…The perception of hostility toward African Americans was heightened by several episodes involving congresswomen of color. In the midst of her floor speech addressing H.R. 4, The personal Responsilibity Act, Congressional veteran Cardiss Collins [D-IL] was interrupted by laughter from the Republican side of the aisle. Having characterized the At as a “callous, cold hearted, and mean-spirited attack on this country’s children” that “punishes Americans for being poor” at the same time Congress was considering tax cuts for the rich, Representative Collins was dismayed by the laughter and all that it betokened. Interrupted her prepared coments she addressed her colleagues directly.
I see some of the members on the other side of the aisle laughing. I ask this quesiton: How many of them have ever been hungry. How many of them have every known what it was not to have a meal? How many of them have known what it was not to have decent shoes, decent clothing, a nice place to live…they do not know about poverty. So I challenge them to come to my Seventh Congressional District of Illinois, my district, and walk in the path of these children that they are cutting off from welfare. walk in the path of the truly needy people who live by welfare because they have no other means by which to live. (C.Collins 1995)”
~Taken from Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions by Mary Hawkesworth (Rutgers University)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Argument Against Sociology Being a Bullshit Study

So, as a Sociology major I have (perhaps inevitably) come across people who have voiced their opinions on why sociology is a crock, convoluted, an unacceptable method for conducting science, and not a valid (impractical) study. I hope to address these issues and give a thorough defense of my field, for (obviously) if I had no defense, I should not be a sociology major. I do completely welcome criticism and comments to what I write, and in fact I would love some. I thoroughly believe that the best analysis is derived from discussion and (logical) argumentation. I have put in  bold  the main points since I realize many of you probably do not want to read my god-knows-how-long argument.  SO on with it. I guess I will address the different arguments I have come across one by one Sociology is not credible because it borrows from so many other fields .  Indeed, Sociology is extremely interdisciplinary, but I think the complexity is what makes it so grand. We coul...
12 comments
Read more

My problems with the strong is the new skinny campaign

When the 'strong is the new skinny' campaign first started, I was pretty excited about it. The first article I saw was a woman who used to be what she considered anorexic. She said she was weak, and barely ate. She fell in love with weight lifting, and said it gave her confidence, strength and courage. She explained how before lifting she was taught to deprive herself, to lack confidence in her body, and be weak. After lifting she felt proud of her new strength, could eat (and was supposed to eat) more, and felt a sense of progress towards muscle, versus progress towards being smaller. She posted new photos of herself showing she didn't look much different (she didn't 'get huge'). Her photos though were fairly normal looking. She probably had a healthy 10-20% body fat, and you could tell she had some solid muscle. Her muscle, however, wasn't rippling out of her skin, and it isn't supposed to be. There are two main types of weight training I want to tal...
4 comments
Read more

Social Motivation and Learning

Hey you guys, I know you guys are busy and hectic with all the midterm grading, but I just wanted to present an original hypothesis/theoretical framework of mine regarding affinity spaces and participatory culture. I’ll give you the long and the short of it so that you can read as little or much as you choose. I definitely value your feedback and am just curious what you think of this. If you think it is valid, it may very well change the way we understand affinity spaces, participatory culture and education. So  the short of   it is this. My theory/hypothesis is that our short term and long term learning interests/motivations/passions are usually linked to using learning as a tool to gain social status in a group. In this context we can understand affinity spaces and participatory culture in a new way. The reason these spaces might be better learning environments is because learning in these environment directly relates to social status in the group. This can be easily ex...
Post a Comment
Read more